"The definitive resource for the global oil and gas energy industries online..."
New Account

Oil demand a real threat to US security



Domestic Oil Production

Domestic Oil Production

The US government has an historic opportunity to strengthen national security by reducing its reliance on foreign oil.

There are huge policies either already in place or currently making their way through congress aimed at accomplishing this goal. Washington has made sure that the majority of public attention falls on policies such as renewable energy technologies, more efficient fuel economy standards, investments in hybrid and electric vehicles, development of natural gas-fueled heavy duty vehicles, and production of advanced biofuels would also create jobs and reduce global warming pollution. But the policies that fail to get the same level of media attention - those that are equally as important to cutting dependence on foreign energy - are government policies on domestic oil production.

Mixed signals on oil policy

Obama has given mixed signals over his views on domestic oil production, particularly offshore drilling, with rigs off the coast of Florida in the Gulf of Mexico likely to be given the go ahead despite opposition from environmentalists. Furthermore, the Minerals Management Service, part of the federal Interior Department, have given Shell the green light to begin exploratory wells off the north coast of Alaska in an Arctic area that is home to large numbers of endangered bowhead whales and polar bears, as well as walruses, ice seals and other species.

Domestic Oil Production

Currently, domestic production and consumption is drastically out of kilter with only a handful of states actually pumping out a significant amount of fuel for national consumption.

But the threats related to this range from the here and now - with troops in Afghanistan and Iraq tied down by their reliance on gas-guzzling equipment - to years into the future when extreme temperatures and rising sea levels could lead to a widespread social breakdown.

Investments in volatile Middle East

The US government, for the time being, find themselves in a Catch 22 situation. With global warming growing alongside ever increasing energy demands, progressing with domestic oil production comes at high environmental cost, but remains essential. Before the US renewable energy sector is at a stage where it can stand alone in supporting the nation's needs, America could find itself increasingly reliant upon exporting countries that have opposing interests as oil production in friendly nations becomes depleted or less viable.

Ultimately, the United States will become more invested in the volatile Middle East, more dependent on corrupt and unsavory regimes, and more involved with politically unstable countries.

It may even get to the point where Washington is forced to decide between maintaining an effective foreign policy or a consistent, reliable energy supply.

The Senate will one day have the opportunity to dramatically reduce US oil consumption by resorting fully to no- and low-carbon energy sources, but the fact remains that domestic demand remains extremely high. Domestic oil production can grown alongside renewable energy technology for as long as it is necessary. But for now, national security must take precedence over helping the environment.

Like this article? Get the RSS feed:


Add New Comment

You are commenting as a Guest. Optional: Login below.

Showing 12 comments

Sort by   Subscribe by email Subscribe by RSS
  • nisse 6 hours ago 2 people liked this.
    American trains are 50 years behind europe. Extremly slow diesel trains crawl across the landscape. What america should do is build a completly new continentwide highspeed electric train network, powered with new modern nuclear power. All that techonology is already known, no research is required, yet it will save very much oil when people use fast trains instead of cars/airplanes.
  • nintendo dsi r4 2 days ago 1 person liked this.
    Its good now to catch peoples attention towards renewable technologies. Its a start at least.
  • Marcus of Arrington 4 weeks ago
    I like to tell people to go and watch the movie Syrianna with George Clooney.
    Recall Matt Damon's advice to the Sheik's GOOD son,
    "this is a war to the death!"
  • Bill Simpson 2 weeks ago
    Pretend that you are an oil exporting country. Now pretend that world oil production begins to fall and the oil price begins to rise rapidly. Will you continue to produce oil as fast as you can? { Answer hint: you might want to begin to stock up on food and get some gold.}
  • Would I continue to produce as fast as I could? That answer depends on the wisdom and vision one has.

    If I am extremely greedy I'd initially cut back on exports as price climbed then slowly and incrementally increase export volumes with price until price destruction killed demand.

    If I were extremely smart I'd only produce at peak demand and maintain my capacity, bank everything made and start drilling geothermal wells and building water supplies. Ever been to Rejkavik and seen the 4 million gallon Rose?

    Anywhere on the planet about 8-10 miles down it's free steam if you have the water!!
  • Nick 1 week ago
    Wow. All 49 states. Try again?
  • Erm... there ARE 50 states on the infographic...
  • Nope, only 49 states, Maine is listed twice, Michigan is missing...
  • Hi Mike and Nick,

    Many thanks for pointing that out. The infographic has now been changed accordingly.
  • Wow, who catches these things? Michigan's not really an important state, is it?
  • mrmcgibblets 8 hours ago
    Why does Texas consume so much oil?
  • Beeyo 4 hours ago
    Um... I'd have to say it's large and has many ports.
Trackback URL  
blog comments powered by Disqus
Bookmark and Share